@InProceedings{FelizardoSMNPHVN:2020:ExRe,
               author = "Felizardo, K{\'a}tia R. and Souza, {\'E}rica F. de and 
                         Malacrida, Tamiris and Napole{\~a}o, Bianca M. and Petrillo, 
                         F{\'a}bio and Halle, Sylvain and Vijaykumar, Nandamudi 
                         Lankalapalli and Nakagawa, Elisa Y.",
          affiliation = "{Universidade Federal Tecnol{\'o}gica do Paran{\'a} (UFTPR)} and 
                         {Universidade Federal Tecnol{\'o}gica do Paran{\'a} (UFTPR)} and 
                         {Universidade Federal Tecnol{\'o}gica do Paran{\'a} (UFTPR)} and 
                         {Universit{\'e} du Qu{\'e}bec {\`a} Chicoutim} and 
                         {Universit{\'e} du Qu{\'e}bec {\`a} Chicoutim} and 
                         {Universit{\'e} du Qu{\'e}bec {\`a} Chicoutim} and {Instituto 
                         Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Universidade de 
                         S{\~a}o Paulo (USP)}",
                title = "Knowledge Management for Promoting Update of Systematic Literature 
                         Reviews: An Experience Report",
            booktitle = "Proceedings...",
                 year = "2020",
         organization = "Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced 
                         Applications, 46.",
            publisher = "IEEE",
             keywords = "Knowledge Management, Systematic Literature Review, SLR, Update.",
             abstract = "Context: Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are important 
                         instruments for both Software Engineering (SE) practitioners and 
                         scientific community. Their value directly depends on their 
                         quality and up-to-date results. However, most of the SLRs are 
                         outdated and the current scenario on how SLRs are documented does 
                         not favor their updating process. Goal: In this scenario, the main 
                         goal of this paper is to present an experience report on how to 
                         transfer the know-how of SLRs to facilitate their updates. Method: 
                         To address this issue, we used a Knowledge Management (KM) model, 
                         known as Nonaka-Takeuchi model, and described how we instantiated 
                         the Model for SLR update. We use two SLRs updates conducted by us 
                         to illustrate some of the knowledge sharing issues. Results: Our 
                         examples showed that the introduction of the concept of KM in the 
                         SLR update is in fact valuable, especially for sharing tacit 
                         knowledge (decisions) taken throughout the review process. 
                         Conclusions: We conclude that KM principles can be applied to 
                         manage the knowledge generated during the update of SLR.",
  conference-location = "Kranj, Slovenia",
      conference-year = "26-28 Aug.",
                  doi = "10.1109/SEAA51224.2020.00080",
                  url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SEAA51224.2020.00080",
                 isbn = "978-172819532-2",
           targetfile = "2020_KatiaFelizardoEtAl_KM_Promoting_Update_SEAA20.pdf",
        urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}